Showing posts with label New York City. Show all posts
Showing posts with label New York City. Show all posts

Saturday, September 25, 2010

The Continued Spread of the Nanny State

The Constitution in PerilImage by Renegade98 via Flickr
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience."
-C. S. Lewis  (1898 - 1963)

I begin my post today with the above quote from C. S. Lewis for a couple of reasons.  It is one of my favorite quotes on the subject of tyranny.  Second, as government and the nanny state intrude more and more into our freedom of choice, it is a most appropriate quote for the times that we live in.

I have been thinking about the above quote much more frequently in recent times.  Everyday the government and groups like the Center for Science in the Public Interest want to trample upon our freedom of choice and dictate how we should live our lives.  This week I came across two more examples of governmental intrusion into our freedom of choice.  I am sure there were many other examples that I did not run across.

The city of Boston is considering banning the sale of sugar sweetened drinks in public buildings.  Boston has already banned the smoking of cigarettes in bars and the use of trans-fat in restaurants.  This follows on the heels of similar actions by the cities of San Francisco and New York.  A member of the panel suggesting the new rules is quoted in the Boston Globe" as saying that "somebody has to take a stand" to reduce consumption to battle obesity.

The other story that caught my attention was the plan by the city of San Francisco (it figures) that wants to expand a ban on the sale of cigarettes in any store that has a pharmacy.  The original ban was on drug stores like Walgreen's, but the expanded ban would include grocery stores and big box retailers.  Their logic is that a store that sells smoking cessation products and medications should not be allowed to sell tobacco products that are bad for you.

I generally do not drink sugar sweetened sodas, nor do I smoke, so I really have no dog in the fight of these two examples.  However, you seriously have to ask yourself where does it end?  If the city of San Francisco can ban the sale of cigarettes in a store that has a pharmacy, would their next step is to ban any product that they deem to be "bad for you?"   Will full service grocery stores that have a pharmacy no longer be allowed to sell chips, candy, or beer?

Now, I am not against all forms of regulation.  I have no problem with restricting the sale of cigarettes to adults only.  Nor do I have a problem with laws banning smoking in restaurants or other buildings.  The government and other groups should inform the public of potential hazards of a product.  Ultimately, however, the decision of whether or not the good should be consumed should be up to the consumer.  It is sad that the very government that wants the government out of our bedrooms has no problem intruding on our kitchens.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, September 10, 2010

We Must Never Forget

September 11, 2001 attacks in New York City: V...Image via WikipediaIt has been nine years since terrorists hijacked four passenger airliners, crashing two into the twin towers in NY City, one in the Pentagon, and one, thanks to the brave actions of some passengers, crashed into a field in Pennsylvania.

I remember so much of that day and the aftermath of it.  That particular morning, I was sitting in my office at work when the phone rang.  It was my wife.  She called to tell me that an airplane had hit one of the towers of the World Trade Center in New York City. I immediately turned off the music I was listening to  and found a station covering the breaking news.

Shortly after the first plane crashed, a second plane crashed into the second tower and then the Pentagon.  I was numb.  I found that I was unable to do anything except to continue to listen to the reports that were coming in over the radio.  My son and nephew were both attending a special school in Baltimore, a few blocks from the Inner Harbor, home of the Baltimore World Trade Center.  Fearing an attack in that area, my brother in law headed up to Baltimore to pick up the boys.  Traffic in the area was gridlocked.
As I said, I was numb at that point.  I was pretty much worthless as far as trying to accomplish any work of substance that day.  Most of the executives of my company were out of town on a business trip.  They were due to fly back that day, but all flights were grounded.  I remember getting calls from some of the executives encouraging us to take action to try to capitalize on the fear generated by the attacks.  I couldn't help but think how crass it was to try to use the attacks as a way to generate sales.

At the time, I worked for a grocery chain, and they thought people would be paranoid of terrorist attacks on the water supply, and I was to arrange for bottled water to be shipped to the stores.  They were afraid there would be a run on supplies and we would not capture all the sales we could.  The one good thing I remember from work was the public affairs manager asking me to arrange for bottled water to be sent for the workers who were helping with aftermath of the Pentagon attack.

The other thing that I recall from that time was how united the country was.  It didn't matter your political party or your religious ideology, we were one country, facing a tragic event.  We were truly the United States of America.  In nine short years, we seem to be more divided than ever, and that is tragic.  We need to remember how we felt that day and in the days immediately after that.  We need to never forget the events of 9/11/2001.

Enhanced by Zemanta

LinkWithin

Related Posts with Thumbnails